£20,000 fine for asbestos failings
A leisure facility was accused of treating asbestos removal as a “DIY project”, exposing staff and members of the public to this hazardous substance. How did they get the job so wrong?
Two employees of a leisure centre were tasked with pulling out fixtures in a disused plant room ahead of a conversion. No asbestos survey was carried out, and the two used angle grinders and hammers to pull out pipework and lagging and a wheelbarrow to transport it through the building to a skip outside. They were not wearing protective masks or clothing. After carrying out this work for a couple of days, a friend of one of the employees alerted them that the material in the skip may be hazardous. Environmental consultants were brought in and confirmed that they were asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), which must only be removed by licensed contractors.
The local Council investigated and found that the company had no plan for the works. It just allowed the employees, who had no knowledge or training in how to deal with asbestos, to go about it in an ad hoc fashion. They were not supplied with PPE. After a day, one of the employees started using his own mask because he was “feeling rough” due to the dust. As well as the ACMs in the skip, investigators found remnants in the plant room and along the route used to transport it through the building.
The court heard that members of the public could have been exposed to asbestos fibres, in addition to the two employees who carried out the work.the leisure centre pleaded guilty to breaching its duty under ss.2(1) and 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of its employees and others affected by its activities. It was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay over £5,000 in costs.
Related Topics
-
Tribunal rejects reliance on adviser as reasonable excuse
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision has confirmed that relying on an accountant does not automatically amount to a reasonable excuse for missing a self-assessment deadline. The case highlights the limits of delegating tax responsibilities. What does this mean in practice?
-
HMRC issues new wave of offshore “nudge” letters
HMRC has issued a further round of “nudge” letters targeting individuals it believes may have undeclared offshore income or gains. The letters form part of HMRC’s ongoing use of data from international information exchange agreements. What should you do if you receive one?
-
Payroll changes for 2026/27
As the end of 2025/26 draws closer, HMRC has published a raft of updates and reminders for employers. Which changes do you need to be aware of that might impact your payroll in 2026/27?